Skip to content

About church services.

Someone asked how I feel about arresting pastors, imams or priests, etc.  who encourage the faithful to congregate in churches.

Instead I would ask, is it their God, or yours?

I get that there is comfort in numbers but really, is this the right time?

If you have a Bible, Torah or other religious tome, and you accept it as the word of your Almighty, can’t you derive solace from those words in your own home just as well as you can in a dedicated building?

Should pastors etc be arrested? I would say no, because without their flock to preach to, they would not be in their churches.

I do think we may have to start fining people who can’t get “social distancing” through their heads.

No one is saying you can’t worship, but think about whether you are endangering others when you decide where to do it.


Now that the current impeachment push is over, what should happen next?

Well, for one thing, you do NOT want to be the next Democratic President, unless it’s 30 years from now.

For another, supporters of the President are clamoring for the reinstatement of the Sedition Act. They absolutely see what has been going on as an attempt to overthrow the government of the United States.

Beyond that, it gets far too profane to reflect it in this blog. Probably the kindest thing we have heard the President’s enemies called is traitorous, and Mrs. Pelosi…well, perhaps you can guess without us having to document it here.

Mrs. Pelousy says she tore up her copy of the SOTU speech because it was full of lies.  Another Trump-hating Democrat went on TV to assert that the President has “…told 15,000 lies since he’s been in office.”

We’d sure like to see those 15,000 lies written down, so they can be fact-checked.

All in all, this is 1968 all over again, but with the potential to be far worse.

No one, no matter how much they support Trump believes he is “perfect,” but he is certainly no worse than a President who crossed the Atlantic and trashed the nation he was supposed to serve and protect and whose wife said she had never been proud of her country.

Which brings us back to the first question.  What now?

Ideally, this should come to a full halt, but as Jerry Nadler has already said, it isn’t going to.

It’s entirely likely that Trump will be re-elected in a landslide. As for his House and Senate enemies, about all Trump’s supporters can do legally is to campaign against Pelosi, Schiff, Waters, the squabs, and Nadler not because they don’t like Trump, but because they are setting the nation up for a socialist takeover.

As for Mrs Pelosi…perhaps we could send her a box of Huggies or Luvs?

Can we pray for laryngitis?

If you have watched any of the so-called “impeachment trial” you have been treated to the mellifluous sound of Adam Schiff’s voice. The man talks, and talks, and talks, and talks, and talks, and talks and – – – -.

Hopefully, the left’s allotted hours are about over.

Actually, most people are not watching.  They may have tuned in for a few hours on the first day, but the Democrats started sounding like a broken record, so most tuned it out.

As we have mentioned before, it is almost criminal to have to pay for these people to trash Trump and his supporters, but unfortunately, there is no way to charge Schiff, mini-Nadler and Hakeem J. with grand larceny.

One thing Dimocrats fail to note is that during the 2016 election, the Obama administration, which included Joe Biden, was aware of and possibly even orchestrating the Russian hoax.

Trump most definitely did target Joe Biden, but if you read the whole Ukrainian call, it was tied into the 2016 election.  Does that mean he couldn’t mention Biden? In fact, was Biden even running against Trump at the time? Not that we noticed, at the time.

Hopefully, one day this will be over.

BTW, where is the Durham report?   It isn’t just President Trump who is at fault here.

TGIF- January 17, 2019

Can we hold their paychecks?

Can anyone explain why we are PAYING Congressional windsuckers to continue with this impeachment BS?

One, pissing off some members of the House of Representatives does not qualify as a high crime or misdemeanor.

Two, If the “impeachment” doesn’t meet the constitutional definition, why do we need a Senate trial?

Now, if we could go back in time and retroactively impeach some of the morons who have committed “crimes” equal to what Trump is accused of doing, that might be worthwhile.

We know now that Joe Biden did exactly what Trump is accused of doing. And G.W Bush’s administration lied about weapons of mass destruction. Obama, far from being loyal to the country, went out of his way to trash America on the world stage.

No, those aren’t high crimes and misdemeanors either, but heck, in for a penny, in for a pound.

And thanks to this boondoggle, we can certainly do it in the future.

Puerto Rico disaster aid.

And speaking of money wasted…hopefully someone is going to watch how the $16 Billion we are sending Puerto Rico is being spent this time. Not that they don’t need the money…they do. But we need to remember the mayor who swore they had no potable water, while standing in front of pallets of the stuff?  According to her, the town couldn’t use the water because FEMA “owned” it.

Whatever the problems last time, we need to be sure the taxpayers don’t get bilked again.


Impeachment, with an asterisk.

And so it begins.   We speak of course of the move to invalidate the will of 2016’s voters,  more formally known as the impeachment trial of Donald J. Trump.

Perhaps not everyone is glued to their televisions, but make no mistake, America does know the effort to overthrow the President is in its last innings.

We tend to agree that there is little to no chance that he will be removed from office, despite the animosity of certain “soft” Republicans.

And of course history will record that he was impeached, although that impeachment will itself be defined by an asterisk.

According to some Democrats, they can impeach him every week if they so choose, and certainly they have tried to do so multiple times.

They eventually got a vote on impeachment on what even some Democrats admit are at best flimsy grounds.

But the question remains:


Because they think he is morally indecent?  He has a lot of Presidential company in that crowd, even including that venerable Democrat, JFK.

Because he is in Russia’s pocket?  Only an idiot or a dyed-in-the-wool ideologue would believe that after the findings of the Mueller report.

We believe that there is more to it than that.

Call it big government devotees or socialism,  there are an alarming number of people who do not believe in government by the people, for the people. Rather, they believe in government OF the people, not as a political theory,  but in the same way the Mafia ruled Sicily.

Yes they do hate Trump, not because he was or maybe even is a gigolo, or has a foul mouth, but because he derailed their plans for America.

And for that reason, we think it was more than appropriate for Nancy Pelosi to be wearing pink as she chortled her way through signing the articles of impeachment before finally releasing them to the Senate.

Is impeachment driving voters away?

More and more we are hearing voters say “F— this impeachment crap.  Washington doesn’t give a damn about voters, so why should we waste our time voting? Democrats just use it to ignore us .”

You really can’t blame them.

In the only civilized way they knew, Trump’s voters tried to tell DC that they were tired of business as usual.  For that they get to be called racists, uneducated rednecks and any other derogatory name Democrats can think of at the moment.

So far, the discontent with our government has not resulted in wholesale street demonstrations, such as those in Iran, but it could happen. It has before.

Maybe it is true that the “average” voter doesn’t pay attention to impeachment, but they damn well know that nothing they wanted Washington to address is being done.

Perhaps Democrats better think about what will happen if they continue to push this “Dump Trump” agenda.

After all, we put up with Obama for eight L-O-O-N-G years. Surely Democrats can do the same.

Edit:  If you don’t think this is possible, read this jerk’s tome.

2016 all over again.

If you are an independent voter, you have only to look at California (or read Lizzie Warren’s “plan” for a green America) to know how a Socialist Democrat America will look.

You may not like Donald Trump’s way of speaking, but he will likely be reelected because just like in 2016, Democrats are not offering a better alternative.

It is unlikely that independents will ever again vote for a candidate due to skin color, gender or ethnicity, but thanks to the current crop of candidates, that probably won’t be a problem this year.

There doesn’t seem to be a single one of these bozos who care about what VOTERS want. No, it’s all about what they think is best for us.

Of course the first they think is best for us is no Donald Trump.  After that it’s solar or wind energy, and oh yes, smaller Big Gulps.


TGIS- 1/11/19

Butt out, PETA.

AOC appeals about as much to me as a well-used feminine sanitary product. Nevertheless, PETA’s   chiding of her for buying a purebred French bulldog puppy crosses a line.

People should own the dog they will love. Yes, it would have been nice if she could have found a Frenchie that had been abandoned, but just getting any old dog because it was in a shelter isn’t right either.

It’s also possible that she wants to breed the dog later on, in which case it’s bloodline matters.

Personally, I love anything with four feet and fur, usually a lot more than I do their two-legged human cousins. Still, as long as she loves and cares for the dog, it’s good.

So, this one time, and probably for the only time, I’m on her side.


A royal MEH.

So  someone 6th or 7th in line to the British throne doesn’t want to be in line for the throne. So what?

It would have been courteous for them to inform Harry’s mother first.  That they didn’t is both rude and cruel.

Other than that, get over it.

Congress needs to read the Constitution.

So, the weenies in Congress have their noses out of joint because the President killed a terrorist without getting their approval.

Uh, he IS supposed to protect the American people.

Other Presidents have had chances to end this guy, and haven’t done it. Who knows how many people’s deaths he has been responsible for because of that?

There are probably a lot more like Suleimani  out there, but that doesn’t mean that taking him out was wrong.

And, given the way Trump has been treated, who knows how long he would have had to argue with Schiff and the rest before offing the guy this time.

Killing a terrorist should be a good thing, not cause for haranguing the President.

Are Democrats Americans?

The CNN headline reads “Top administration officials to brief Congress on Iran as Democrats move to rein in Trump.”

But who is going to rein in the “top” Democrats?

Even Jeh Johnson, a former Obama official, knows the President had every constitutional right to make this call.

And as for why he didn’t tell Pelosi, Schiff or the rest of the Democratic leadership…that would have been like taking out a full page ad in the NYT.

You can decide for yourself whether killing a man who enjoys killing Americans and anyone else, and was good at it, was a good idea.

Perhaps the Dems would prefer serving up a sacrificial American every few weeks instead, especially if  they could be sure it was a Trump supporter.

Iran was clearly warned. Don’t kill Americans if you don’t want to die yourselves.

Is it going to get messy now? More than likely it will.   Iran has been used to empty threats and massive bribes for so long, it may take them awhile to get the point.

But listening to the Democrats go on about the deed, when they nearly sanctified Obama for killing bin Laden is just downright sickening.

These people are not patriots.  In fact, it’s doubtful they are even Americans

TGIF – January 3, 2020

Are you kidding?

So the Democrats in the Gang of Eight have their tidy whities in a bunch because the President didn’t consult them before offing Qadeem Suleimani?

Let’s see, he should consult the Pink Horsemen of Impeachment before stopping another massacre in Iraq?    Right.

After 9/11 a number of people registered their opinion that the malign nations of the Middle East should be reduced to big glassy parking lots.  They are still right.

Americans for knife control?

Today we have two more murderous stabbings, one in Austin, Texas and one in Paris, France, not to mention the Hannukah stabbings.

Where are the people calling out for knife and machete confiscation?

It’s time to acknowledge that evil people, not their tools, kill.

California, the commune state?

California is slipping ever closer to demanding communal living, if stories like this are to be believed.

BTW, the root word of communism is commune.

California presumably still has lots of unused land in the San Joaquin and  Imperial valleys.

How about moving the “homeless” there? At least there you could cover up their scat with dirt.